about us | newsletter | contact | archive | members area
Bogdan Nitulescu, Tremend
Cryptocurrencies volatility is a big problem»

Schoenherr: Challenges of the new rules on competition

Denigration and diversion of clients, practices of unfair competition: At the beginning of September, the amendments to the Law on unfair competition, brought by the Government Ordinance no. 12/2014, will enter into force. These changes are intended to update a regulation which, although was adopted in 1991, has proved difficult to apply in practice.

2014-09-01 14:16:31

At the time of its adoption, Law no. 11/1991 was incriminating as unfair competition practices a series of behaviors that were subsequently regulated by specific legislation in various fields. This fact led in time to sometimes conflicting and overlapping regulation jurisdictions. In an attempt to clarify the legal and institutional framework, by the recent changes certain practices (such as practices related to the protection of merchants against misleading and comparative advertising or practices related to the protection of industrial property rights in the field of trademarks and geographic indications) have been removed from the scope of the Law on unfair competition.

At the same time, the Law of unfair competition shall continue to consider the denigration of a competitor or its products and the diversion of clients of an undertaking as practices of unfair competition. Denigration involves the spread by an undertaking or by its representative / its employee of untrue information on the competitor's activities or its products, information that is capable of harming the latter's interests. Diversion of an undertaking's clients may be considered as unfair competition when such practice is car-ried out by a current or former employee or by a representative of the undertaking, by use of business secrets, for which the undertaking has taken reasonable measures in or-der to ensure their protection and of which disclosure may harm the interests of that un-dertaking.

In addition to the two types of practices specifically defined, the law leaves open the scope of the practices that may fall under the unfair competition scope. Thus, any other commercial practices which are contrary to the fair practices and the general principle of good faith and which cause or may cause damages to any market participants may be considered as practices of unfair competition. Despite this lax regulation, the use of the provisions of the Law on unfair competition in order to protect the consumers' individual interests or of the undertakings interests will remain a burden on those affected, given the fact that they must provide evidence on the existence of the practice of unfair com-petition and on damages / risk of damages. In addition, the Competition Council, which is the competent authority to protect undertakings against unfair competition practices, may decide not to act when it considers that, in a particular case, the effects of such a practice are minor, mainly with regards to the gravity of the practice, the circumstances under which it was committed, as well as the importance of the economic sector, in which the practice was committed, in the overall national economy. By this manner, the Competition Council has the right to not judge any kind of cases. However, any interested party has the possibility to either appeal the refusal of the authority to decide on a practice, or to directly address the court of law.

For cases in which the competition authority decides to act, it can make use of investiga-tion powers similar to those used when investigating cartels or other anticompetitive practices. For example, in order to investigate practices of unfair competition, the com-petition inspectors will be able to conduct unannounced inspections (in accordance with Competition Law no. 21/1996, republished) or to impose fines if the undertakings do not provide the information requested by the competition authority or if such undertakings refuse to comply with an unannounced inspection.

The recent amendments bring greater clarity on the legislation, by defining specific con-cepts such as "commercial practices", "honest practices", "commercial secret". Note the definition of the "fair competition", a concept that is often used, even in the current speech, yet not always correctly, is introduced for the first time in the national legislation.

Thus, fair competition is defined as the situation of market rivalry, in which each under-taking tries to simultaneously obtain sales, profit and/or market share, by offering the best practical combination of prices, quality and additional services, with the observance of the honest practices and the general principle of good faith.

New Rules on the Competition Council investigations

Besides the amendments brought to the Law on unfair competition, Ordinance no. 12/2014 has introduced also, in a discreet fashion, certain amendments to the Competition Law no. 21/1996, which generally prohibits and sanctions anticompetitive agreements (such as cartels or the abuse of a dominant position).
The amendments mainly target the quorum conditions that must be met for the assembly of the authority's plenum and for the adoption of the plenum's decisions, as well as the manner of the unfolding of investigations.

An important change that helps clarify the legal status of the undertakings that are in-vestigated by the competition authority is the Competition Council's obligation to inform the investigated undertakings with regards to the closing of the ex officio investigations for lack of evidence in which such undertakings were involved.

Another amendment targets the manner in which the rights of the undertakings that are investigated by the Competition Council are exercised. In order to prepare their defenses, undertakings that are involved in the investigations unfolded by the Competition Council have the right to request access to the investigation file and to obtain copies of the documents in the file. However, if such documents are considered confidential (eg, information representing business secrets of the undertakings that provided information during the investigation), the access to file may we awarded only by order of the Presi-dent of the Competition Council and, depending on the case's circumstances, the President may award or refuse the access to confidential information.

By an amendment brought in 2010, the possibility that the order by which the President of the Competition Council decides on the access to certain documents of the case file by the undertakings may be appealed directly in the court of law, without waiting for a final decision of the competition authority with regards to the investigated case, was intro-duced. The appeal of the order in the court of law triggered the suspending of the inves-tigation procedure until the there was a decision on the appeal of the said order. In prac-tice, the use of such an appeal determined, in certain cases, to the delaying by several months of the unfolding of the hearings and of the final decision on the case.

As a result of the recent amendments, the investigated undertakings will be able to appeal the said order only at the end of the investigation procedure, together with the decision issued by the competition authority. Even if by this amendment the situation before 2010 is to some extent restored, it is expected that this amendment will be criticized, especially for its implications with regards to the investigated undertakings' right of defense.

Even if the attention of the critics, especially of those familiarized with the competition law, may be caught by this amendment, there is also another amendment that deserves at least the same level of attention given its possible implications with regards to the overall competition policy.

This amendment consists of the newly introduced provision which allows the Competition Council, in order to effectively make use of its resources for unfolding of an investigation, to "prioritize" the investigated cases based on "the potential impact on the effective com-petition", the "general consumers' interest" or on "the strategic importance of the con-cerned economic sector"

It is interesting to see if, in practice, the Competition Council will make use of this in-strument in order to select its cases on which it acts ex officio or if the prioritization shall have any effect on the ongoing cases or on the scenarios where the consumers or the undertakings, which are victims of an anticompetitive behavior, submit complaints to the Competition Council.

Opinion by: Georgeta Gavriloiu, Senior Associate at Schoenherr Attorneys at Law and Silviu Vasile, Junior Lawyer at Schoenherr Attorneys at Law.

There are 0 comments:

Validation Code

0 Comments  |  6503 Views
Daily Info
Smart city is not a fad, it's a necessity

In June 2018, the ranking of the most "smart" cities in the world was published. In other words, the most advanced cities in terms of human capital, social cohesion, the econo...

Ondrej Safar, CEZ Group: "Romania can become a hub for international smart solutions providers"

"We are already in the digital age, so the upward trend of implementing smart solutions is inevitable in all areas," he tells The Diplomat-Bucharest. "Especially in terms of u...

Telekom Romania, a strong supporter of Smart City development in Romania

Just like many other countries in the world Romania is now facing an unprecedented growth of the urban population, which can be both beneficial and detrimental for the society...

In the industrial era, the fight was for finite material resources. Not anymore

Now organizations fight and develop themselves for and around their talent. In a nutshell, getting ahead in today's business world is all about attracting and inspiring an e...

Richard Sareczky, Mol Limo: "We look at expansion locations across CEE including Romania"

Consumer mobility behaviour is changing, leading to up to one out of ten cars sold in 2030 potentially being a shared vehicle and the subsequent rise of a market for fit-for-p...




More on News
President Iohannis urges Romanians to be more united, stay involved in modernizing Romania

Romania's President Klaus Iohannis urged Romanians in France to be more united and stay involved as much as they are now in helping modernise Romania.


EBRD cuts economic growth forecast for Romania

Romania's economy will grow by 4.2 per cent this year and by 3.6 per cent in 2019, according to the most recent forecast released by the European Bank for Reconstruction an...

1 Comment

Dacia receives 115.8 million RON in state aid from the Finance Ministry

The Romanian Finance Ministry has signed five more grant agreements under the state aid scheme, and among the beneficiaries are Automobile Dacia, with RON 115.8 million.

1 Comment

OTP Bank Romania signs investment funds distribution deal with Eurobank Fund Management Luxembourg

OTP Bank Romania signed a partnership with Eurobank Fund Management Company (Luxembourg) for the distribution of investment funds in Romania. Thus, from December 1st, OTP B...

Fondul Proprietatea expresses disappointment over Engie listing rejection

Fondul Proprietatea is disappointed with the decision taken by the majority shareholder of Engie SA, Romania Gas Holding B.V., to oppose the listing of the company, accordi...

1 Comment

Europe must become a producer of new technologies, not just a consumer of technologies, says EC

Europe must become a producer of new technologies, not just a consumer of technologies, said Gerard de Graaf, Director for the Digital Single Market in Directorate-General ...

1 Comment

FDI in Romania rises 10 per cent after ten months in 2018

Non-residents' direct investment in Romania (net FDI) totaled 4.56 billion Euro in January-October 2018, around 10 per cent more compared to the same period of 2017, Romani...

1 Comment